OK, first, I would like to reply to the commenters on the "Dear Paly" post.
UnknownJan 12, 2012 08:06 PM
As a critic of your previous post, let me clarify my position - I enjoy a good rivalry as much as anyone, especially Paly vs. Gunn, but just felt some of the comments pushed the envelope a bit (but only slightly). Maybe I am overly sensitive or I did not read it with the correct tone in my mind. Nonetheless, as I said to a friend of yours today, it was very well written, as is this post, so that does make it interesting to read - and I've been thoroughly impressed having now had a chance to scour your blog a bit.
On a different sports note: Any thoughts on Stanford basketball and a run at the Pac-12 tournament this season?
Dear Unknown,
Thanks for the compliments, and my apologies if you were at all bothered by anything I wrote. I'll address that later. In any case, I love this Stanford team, expect them to win the (thoroughly awful) Pac-12, and will write more about that as the season heads down the stretch. I'd be honored if you checked back for it. (Note: this is how mature people resolve their conflicts.)
Aris AzarmsaJan 12, 2012 08:26 PM
your a joke you have no life. your blog sucks
Dear Aris,
You have confused the two iterations of "your" and "you're." In this case, you have successfully used "your" once, and unsuccessfully used "your" once. Despite this, you have succeeded in ruining my day with your biting insults. As someone who I believe was once so desperate for new members in his fantasy baseball league that he asked someone he had never met (me) to join two hours before the draft on Facebook, I am sure you are a high authority on the matters you have brought up. If you happen to edit or publish any texts on ways to improve oneself, please alert me immediately and I will not hesitate to send my (tax-deductible?) payment to your listed billing address.
JacksonJan 12, 2012 09:04 PM
There is a difference between poking fun in a humorous way and being pretentious. Being the genius that you are, I'm sure you can figure out which one describes you.Dear Jackson,
Yes. I am the former. Thank you. If we had more people like you in the world, it would be a much better place.
UnknownJan 12, 2012 09:23 PM
you should have the courage to say who you really are before you try to roast, optimist, instead of hiding behind your pussy ass blog. your sarcastic apology, by the way, is THE CLEVEREST THING IN THE F***ING WORLD
p.s. Paly did better than gunn on the sat last year. roasted.
Dear Unknown II (Same Person?),
Thank you again for the compliments. You and your brethren have succeeded in raising my spirits after they were lampooned by "Aris." I am sorry for hiding behind my blog. If I had a large wall, I would hide behind that, because it is much taller. I do not, however, have one. Congratulations on the SAT. I did not know there was a whole month last year where all the questions were, "Devise a particularly non-witty comment that you would use to respond to an overblown blog post. Do not capitalize, aside from when you want to hit 'Caps Lock.'" I can see how you were able to do so well, though.
Now, to address some common misconceptions that seem to be swirling around the campus of one Palo Alto High School. Let's take these one by one:
- My intention is to belittle and anger Paly students
No. In fact, I did not expect more than a few Paly students to read my blog about the game, nor did I expect those who read it to give three flying you-know-whats. I will take it as a compliment to my writing skills that I could get you so incensed, though maybe I should just assume that emotions run high whenever Paly students are forced to read more than three lines of any kind of writing. (This is called "beating a dead horse." I have made this joke too many times. However, it is still funny.)
- I am serious about what I said
Short answer: I wasn't. Read some of the (scintillating) material that I have posted in the past year, get a feel for the way I write, and then try reading the Paly posts again. The only legitimate gripe I have against Paly is that some fraction of their student body seems to take one blog post (which, I may add, praised Paly more than it derided them, if you had bothered to read it in full) as an all-out war declaration. Work on that. In fact, I guarantee you can find some classmates of yours who may (gasp) like me and/or be able to defend what I wrote. It'll be hard, but you can do it. Try it out! Think of it as a scavenger hunt.
- "North Side" and "South Side" are actual Palo Alto gangs
They aren't. However, if there were a "turf war," or whatever they are called these days, the Palo Alto Police would be on the spot faster than you could say, "Wait, is this seriously happening?" Palo Alto Police live for these moments.
- The best way to retaliate against someone who says something you don't like is to threaten him or write atrocious opinion columns (referring to the second article, not the first) about his blog
This one is true. Good job.
- 4+4=9
Wrong. (I have successfully overused this joke as well. Again, however, still funny.)
I hope I have clarified some things for everyone. Please let me know with your kind words and thoughtful comments. ALSO DON'T FORGET TO FOLLOW SINCE I'M PROVIDING YOU WITH LIKE TWO DAYS WORTH OF STUPID ENTERTAINMENT. JUST CLICK THE "JOIN THIS SITE" BUTTON OVER TO THE RIGHT LOVE YOU BYE.
The Optimist, you are my hero.
ReplyDeletewhats your SAT score?? your making fun of all of paly, so you must be some type of genius? oh wait, no... your probably just some bitch who hides between his blog.
ReplyDeleteI will simultaneously take the high road and avoid the coward's way out by asking someone to kindly Facebook message Aris my SAT score. Make sure he tells you his, too, to make it a fair exchange.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI looked into this, Anonymous. Apparently they were actually dressed as Paly girls who had just lost to Gunn. Regardless of their costume's intent, however, I assure you that to those of us with a sense of humor, it was huh-lair-ee-us (see what I did there?) It almost (almost) makes me want to go watch a JV girls' soccer game.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTo anonymous- When you see a promiscuous looking girl, do you always think they have been sexually abused?? That is a terrible accusation...
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteplease take note that they are dressing up as paly girls that got "beat up" by gunn girls not as sexually abused paly girls. that was never their intent. many of our sports teams choose to dress in that manner instead of dressing up in the usual red and black
Deleteahh my bad then.
ReplyDeletewhyd you delete my comments hahaha
ReplyDeleteNot only did I not delete your comments, Aris, but according to what they say, you removed them. I believe you can undo that with a click of the button.
ReplyDelete@Anon, I think the idea was "Beat Paly" and so the team was dressed as beaten Paly studnets. Not to say the execution was flawless...
ReplyDeleteSTALIN RISES FROM THE DEAD! REPENT
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvdf5n-zI14
ReplyDeleteI am dying, Optimist. I can't take this anymore.
ReplyDeleteToo funny.
I'm not a huge fan of our "Beat Paly" outfits either, but honestly, Paly girls dressed up as super slutty police officers when their theme was "Gunn Control". It's just a dress up theme and the point was for the school to get pumped, not to offend Paly. It really shouldn't matter.
By the way, the "South side"ers on Facebook all love you :) Thanks for the immense entertainment.
If you're an offended Paly kid, or if you're Aris....go study for your finals. Seriously.
LAST 3 STANDING MIXTAPE
ReplyDeleteDROPPING JANUARY 19TH!
DeleteDude, well done. As a Paly student and fellow (less productive) opinion writer, I must say I am a big fan of this. You are a witty and prolific guy. Don't fret over the hooligans who are displeased by your work. Any publicity is good publicity, I bet they have inadvertently quintupled your humble blog's regular traffic. Sure, you wrote something a bit controversial, but what the hell, it spices shit up.
ReplyDeleteBesides, people who take offense at being called dumb are just dumb. Or unnecessarily insecure, especially 'cause Paly kids are hella smart. Whatever man. Keep up the good work. Also thought this could be a good opportunity to plug my opinion column, THE DANGER ZONE. http://palyvoice.com/node/923. (sorry, that was shitty of me).
Love,
Carter
I too concur with Mr. Carter here, Debate and DANGER ZONE guru, and would like to kindly remind The Optimist that not all of the Optimist followers here at scenic Palo Alto Senior High School have become furiously incensed, writing columns like the second one on The Viking, nor that all the writers on The Viking are similarly up in arms over this whole ordeal as were those two Managing Editors.
DeleteIf this keeps going on, and a North vs. South battle seems somewhat eminent, if only over Twitter and Facebook, than I would kindly like to remind those in South PA that even though you all have Midtown, we have both the (currently being renovated) Art Center, and the (now vacant) Edgewood Plaza Shopping Center. We can hole up in the library for as long as necessary, fueled off the food trucks from Edgewood eats. If that doesn't scare you all off, I don't know what will.
As one last add, I would like to mention the similarity between this fiasco and another, from a recent movie, one that I'm sad to see hasn't been reviewed upon on by the Movie Optimist (although I understand that blog hasn't been up for long enough). Given the fact that nearly all of this publicity is going on over Facebook, if you can find a way to re-create Facemash for Palo Alto, I will pledge to do my part in helping kill the servers. Zuckerberg FTW. Maybe this can be our mutual healing process....?
I told you that that would be the last add, but I can't help but mention my confusion on how the Stanford bball team will win the Pac-12, much less (unfortunately) ever get past Cal. I'm sorry, but they have no one who can do anything against Gutierrez. And unless Anthony Brown becomes the prolific scorer we want him to be, and Dwight Powell actually nuts up and decides to stop playing like a wimp and all finesse-like, than I can't see much more than a second or third place finish in the Pac-12.
Alex/Carter/I know your real name because I clicked your link, Alex Carter: Thank you. And, I will add, they have MORE than quintupled my page viewing. I don't know how to take your compliments other than to assure you that our readership is very much the same size (actually yours is probably bigger since you write for a school-affiliated outlet) aside from this random two-day period. Also, I liked your thing on "Immortals." Kind of tacky to throw your link on here, but equally savvy. Good to find out over these last few hours that cool people still exist at Paly.
ReplyDeleteDEAR GUNN,
ReplyDeleteif your reading this far, your not dead yet. you have failed Gunns requirements...
And you complained that what Optomist said was tasteless? Why don't you take your opinion where it will make everyone happy: safely at the bottom of the ocean.
Deletethere is nothing wrong with writing a blog almost entirely absent of wit and intelligence in order to incite controversy, provide humor and boost your publicity. very famous and successful people do it every day, and if you keep this up, maybe one day you'll be among them. however, there is something wrong with criticizing people who get mad at the blog in question. there is also something wrong with writing two "apology" blogs that attempt to reconcile your position, claiming people are overreacting, it was just a joke and that we should put it all behind us. as a heads up, comedy makes people mad. regardless of whether or not you find it funny, because although your pretentious style of humor does not appeal to me I'm sure it keeps numerous people in stitches, a joke aimed at someone, especially with no evidence or truth behind it, is sure to incite some hatred.
ReplyDeleteso congratulations on your skill as a highly successful blogger. you made some jokes, you made some people laugh, you made more people mad, and you increased your blogs popularity. its not a sacrifice I would make, but it is certainly one to be respected. so stop trying to reconcile your position. Paly is not happy with you, and it has a very good reason to be. you will not "party", as one of your supporters so eloquently put it, with Paly kids ever again, but you did quintuple the views of your blog. well done, and move on to the next blog
I don't think the original intention was to incite controversy or boost his publicity, but provide witty humor to his friends and the Gunn community yes. We all love to enjoy David's blogs and opinions, and if you guys at Paly don't, you are truly overreacting and creating such unnecessary drama due to a....blog post. I honestly can't see anyone at Gunn reacting anywhere close to the same way if the same thing happened to us. Just read your entire comment, you're blowing the situation 1000x than what it's originally meant to be. David likes blogging. We at Gunn like reading his blog. It gives us a really needed break in our hugely academic-filled lives. I sincerely believe that everyone at Gunn is united on this issue and takes this no more than a joke, while the most vocal ones at Paly are clearly the ones most butthurt, as I'm sure there are many people at Paly who are nonetheless quietly enjoying these posts. Paly is a great academic and athletic school. Gunn is a greater academic school but less of an athletic school. Paly beat Gunn last year and maybe the year before in SAT scores, but Gunn beat Paly in every other year, including (I'm pretty sure due to the 3 or maybe 4 2400's in the class of 2012, not to mention plenty of above 2300's) this year. We don't need to show that off to Paly, but if we beat you guys once in football, are we honestly going to say we're better at football? That's what Paly kids are saying with the SAT scores. We're not trash at athletics, as many Paly kids often say, we just get compared to Paly's extremely successful athletic department that we're many times looked down as "trash". There's no shame in losing to state or CCS champs. In short, Gunn's great at many sports, including basketball, volleyball, wrestling, and many other programs that "people actually care about", but we're just not as good as Paly.
ReplyDeleteAll of this should relax. I'm sure this is the last thing David expected from his occasional sarcastic but very amusing blog post, but too bad a lot of Paly doesn't seem to be able to handle it. I'm glad it made this Gunn-Paly rivalry so much more interesting, but at the same time it's silly, and we all have friends at both schools. I have many friends at Paly, and it honestly sucks a lot to lose to Paly the majority of the times in almost all of the sports. Again if the reverse happened and we beat Paly the majority of the times, would Gunn react in that way to one of your blogger's post? Knowing the Gunn people and community very well, I would never think so. Now I'll go study for finals like what everyone else should be doing. Hopefully we all remain friends and look past this extremely weird point in Palo Alto high school's history.
I think you''l find that last year, a paly columnist, who I might add had his name on the story, wrote a much more amusing, far less inflammatory and much more intelligent piece on the Paly-Gunn football game, only to find Gunn parents and students up in arms against him. Gunn not only has, but certainly would react in exactly this way to any blog post. Davids blog would not have caused such a stir if his comments had been true, well thought out, and reasonable. instead, they were inane, false and mostly revolved around the highly original insult "Paly sucks," although he was unable to provide any concrete evidence to support this. if he truly was writing a friendly blog, then he is much less intelligent than I previously gave him credit for, but I personally think he had the intention of amassing blog views
DeleteCould you link to that article? I don't think I've seen it and I'm just curious.
DeleteWhile I'm sure David would like to attract new readers in general, I don't think he specifically wrote the post in question with the intent of sparking controversy to increase page views. I've been reading the blog regularly since August, and the tone of that post was pretty consistent with everything else he's wrote. If you're interested, search "College Tour" and see what he wrote about those schools, many of which he seems to be applying to, particularly Columbia. They're obviously all good schools and he made fun of them just as much as Paly. Btw, he's also made fun of some things about Gunn on the blog.
I also disagree with your comment that it would have been fine if his comments were true. If you make fun of a terrible, underperforming school for being stupid, that's much more mean-spirited. Teasing a school that's obviously good, but historically not quite as good as his school, shouldn't be seen as anything but light-hearted fun.
Meanwhile, regarding the delightful poster above who has chosen to identify himself by the wonderfully classy name "SUCK US OFF GUNN" : Did you really just go there? Even as a joke, that's ridiculously offensive and hurtful and unacceptable. If any comment deserved to start this huge controversy, it would be that.
http://palyvoice.com/node/24095
Deleteunfortunately viking switched websites midyear and the original story with its original comments was lost. however, as a member of Paly journalism (not viking) I remember the uproar this article caused, even though the author was merely pointing out facts, unlike David.
I would also like to say that I do not believe his comments were attempting to spark controversy. I do believe that his comments were controversial and not particularly light hearted. David constructs his blog out of making fun of other people. Again, there is nothing wrong with that. However, as he has stated himself, he did not believe Paly students would read the blog, in the same way that nobody at Columbia has ever heard of him, and therefore are not up in arms. He aimed close to home, and is suffering the repercussions. my point in this argument has always been that david had every right to post his blog. he does not, however, have the right to criticize those paly students who are angry about his comments in his typical pretentious tone, and he should not have posted two apologies unless they were sincere. as a blogger who says controversial things, he does not have the right to ridicule his opponents simply for not liking what he is saying.
also, as intelligent as the previous comments have been (this isnt sarcasm I genuinely respect your arguments), I would like to hear David defend himself, not people who may or may not know why he initially wrote the blog